Abstract

The cultural-historical activity theory was developed by the Russian psycholo- gist Vygotsky and his colleagues in the 1920s and 1930s. Since then, it has been expanded globally and rapidly, particularly during the past 15 years. However, there has been little interaction between the broader international community and China with respect to the development of the theory and its applications in China, which has taken place along a path of its own. This paper aims to examine this development, focusing on 1) the general situation and background of the research, 2) the basic understanding, theoretical construction and unique features of development; 3) the focal areas in and limitations of the application; and 4) idea evolution in terms of different generation theories. At the end of the paper, emerging trends and future prospects of activity theoretical research in China will be suggested and discussed.

References

Literature in Chinese

Bruner, J. (1998). Praising the polemic of two psychologists Piaget and Vygotsky. Sichuan Psychological Science, 1.

Chen, H. C. (1986). Recent discussions on the theory of activity in psychological circles in the Soviet Union. Acta Psychologica Sinica, No.2, 215-223.

Gao, W. (1999a). Methodological orientation of Vygotsk’s mental development theory. Global Education Prospect, 3, 45-47.

Gao, W. (1999b). The impact of Vygotsky’s mental development theory on educational practice. Global Education Prospect, 5, 46-50.

Gong, H. R. (1985). On L.S. Vygotsky’s theory of higher-level mental functions. Acta Psychologica Sinica, No.1, 15-22.

Gong, H. R. (1993). The debate between Vygotsky and J. Piaget on the issue of child’s thinking and speech. Applied Psychology, 1.

Gong, H. R. (2001). Vygotsky’s theory of scientific psychology in China. In Chinese Psychological Association. (Ed.), Contemporary psychology in China (pp. 349-354). Beijing: People’s Education Press.

Gong, H. R., & Huang, X. L. (1999). The Building of School Class Community and Students’ Personality Development. Guangzhou: Guangdong Education Press.

Li, X. (1979). A. H. Leont’ev’s activity theory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, No.2, 233-241.

Li, X. (1982). From activity to communication. Acta Psychologica Sinica, No.1, 11-18.

Li, Z. (1981). The view of practice in psychology: A theoretical approach to the relationship between mind and activity, Acta Psychologica Sinica, No.3, 249-256.

Liu, H. L., Huang, R. H., Fan, L., & Sun, B. B. (2005). A theoretical model of CSCL interaction research. China Audio- & Video-based Education, 219, 18-23.

Liu, H. S., & Zhou, Z. K. (2005). The spread and pructice of Vygotsky’s psychological theory in contemporary China. Invited speech in the Second International Symposium: New Learning Challenges, November 18-19, Osaka.

Ma, Y. K. (2006). The inheritance and development of social constructionism psychology to Vygotsky’s ideas. Advances in Psychological Science, 14(1), 154-160.

Ma, Y. K., & Ye, H. S. (2004). Difference and compensation: Comparative view of Piagetian and Vygotskian cognitive development theories. Psychological Science, 27, 6.

Mao, J. G. (2002). An interpretation of Vygotskian approaches to second language acquisition research, Journal of Zhejiang Normal University, 27, 86-89.

NVRA (1999). Report on the first seminar of the National Vygotskian Research Association. Psychological Science, No.1.

Pan, S. (1980). Educational Psychology. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

Shi, W. S., & Chen, J. L. (2003). Enlightenment of Vygotsky-Leont’ev-Luria School activity theory for mental health education. Journal of East China Normal University, 3, 83-90&96.

Shi, W. S., & Chen, J. L. (2004). Mental health: Interpretation based on Vygotsky-Leont’evLuria school activity theory. Psychological Science, 27, 5.

Wang, G. R. (2000a). A theoretical analysis on the current wave of Vygotskian research. Psychological Science, 23, 6.

Wang, G. R. (2000b). Report on the second seminar of the National Vygotskian Research. Association, Psychological Exploration, No.1.

Wang, G. R. (2003). Report on the fourth seminar of the National Vygotskian Research Association. Psychological Exploration, 23, 1.

Wang, W. J. (2000a). Vygotsky’s ‘the theory of proximal zone of development’ and the country’s preschool instruction reform. Research on Preschool Education, No.6.

Wang, W. J. (2000b). Implications of Vygotsky’s ‘the theory of proximal zone of development’ for the country’s instruction reform. Psychological Exploration, No.2.

Wang, W. J. (2002). Review on the situated cognition and learning research. Educational Technology Communication, 14, 3.

Xiang, G. X., & Lai, X. Y. (2005). Activity theory and its influence on the design of learning environment. Research on Autio-visual Education, 146(6), 9-14.

Xu, G. Y. (2001). Vygotsky and psycholinguistics in Russia. Psychological Exploration, No.3.

Xu, S. J. (1980). Vygotsky’s view on the development of thinking and its research evaluation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, No. 3, 361-366.

Yang, L. J. (2000). Activity theoretical and constructivist perspectives on learning, Educational Science Research, 4, 59-65.

Zhang, J. F., Hao, Y. P., & Liu, Y. X. (2003). Framework of adaptive process integration based on activity theory. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 9(9), 765-770.

Zhang, S., & Li, Y. B. (2005). The activity theoretical perspective on the design of virtual group learning activity. Distance Education in China, 11, 49-52, 56.

Zhang, S. Y. (1985). On the historical formation and basic ideas of A.H. Leont’ev’s activity theory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, No.1, 23-30.

Zhang, W. L., & Li, W. G. (2003). Reflecting on the theory and practice of the country’s instruction design. Educational Technology, 16, 1/2.

Zhao, H. J. (1997). The origination, development and prospect of activity theory. Academic Journal of Northeast Normal University, 1, 87-93.

Zheng, F. X., & Ye, H. S. (2003). Current research on Vygotsky’s psychological theory in Russia. Psychological Exploration, 11(6), 711-719.

Zheng, T. N. (2005). Thinking learning in school from activity theory perspective. Open Education Research, 11(1), 64-68.

Zheng, W., & Wang, D. W. (2005). Beyond the debate on the learning regarding its individuality and sociality, Global Education, 34(1), 14, 25-29.

Zhu, J. X (1999). From Piaget to Vygotsky: The influence of the two psychologist on preschool education. Research on Preschool Education, 6, 78.

Zhu, Z. X. (1979). Child Psychology. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

Zhu, Z. X. & Lin, C. D. (1988). The History of Child Psychology. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Presss.

Literature in English

Cole, M. (1988). Cross-cultural research in the sociohistorical tradition. Human Development, 31(3), 137-151.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental Research. Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki.

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 129-152.

Hong, J. Z. (2000). Change as a challenge for shopfloor learning: The case of western and local manufacturing companies in China. International Review of Education, 46(6), 581-597.

Hong, J. Z., & Engeström, Y. (2004). Changing communication principles between Chinese managers and workers: Confucian authority chains and guanxi as social networking. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(4), 552-585.

Lektorsky, V. A. (1999). Activity theory in a new era. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspective on activity theory (pp. 65-69.). Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.

Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress.

Star, S. L. (1998). Working together: Symbolic interactions, activity theory, and information systems. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.

Wu, Z. J. (2002). Teachers’ ‘knowledge’ and curriculum change: A critical study of teachers’ exploratory discourse in a Chinese university. Lancaster: Lancaster University.